[pcap-ng-format] Is there a reason to keep PCAP-DumpFileFormat.xml around?

[Hadriel Kaplan]

My 2 cents: get rid of it - we'll have it in the git history anyway if need be.

-hadriel


On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Guy Harris <guy at alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> I gave a quick check, and it's mostly the same as the first version of draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng.xml, with a few typos that were fixed in the first version of draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng.xml, and some formatting changes such as handling the reference to RFC 2119 a little differently.
>
> All the work is being done on draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng.xml; nobody's checked in any changes to PCAP-DumpFileFormat.xml since 2014-06-29 07:31:56 UTC.
>
> Is there any reason to keep PCAP-DumpFileFormat.xml around?
>
> Should we have something to make it clear that the correct document is draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng.xml, not PCAP-DumpFileFormat.xml?
> _______________________________________________
> pcap-ng-format mailing list
> pcap-ng-format at winpcap.org
> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/pcap-ng-format