[pcap-ng-format] Proposed new Alternative Packet Block

[Serge Aleynikov]

See the pull request #40:

https://github.com/pcapng/pcapng/pull/40

Comments/suggestions are welcome.

Concerning informing ops-area WG, I would appreciate if some member of both
lists could CC it there.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 9:04 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr at sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> Serge Aleynikov <serge at aleynikov.org> wrote:
>     > What is the process of getting new proposals merged with the
>     > https://github.com/pcapng/pcapng/blob/master/draft-
> tuexen-opsawg-pcapng.xml
>     > draft?
>
>     > Is that that the proposal is discussed on this list and then a PR is
>     > submitted to the https://github.com/pcapng/pcapng repository?
>
> Yes, (or vv: a discussion that points to specific text to change is easier
> to
> deal with) but I'd also suggest being on the opsarea WG list.
>
> I rather think we should CC some things there.
>
> --
> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh
> networks [
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network
> architect  [
> ]     mcr at sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on
> rails    [
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pcap-ng-format mailing list
> pcap-ng-format at winpcap.org
> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/pcap-ng-format
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winpcap.org/pipermail/pcap-ng-format/attachments/20160816/1c15c55c/attachment.html>