[Winpcap-users] Wpcap.lib on 64bits Platform
ryan.fowler at thomsonreuters.com
Thu Jun 26 07:04:41 GMT 2008
> Besides, I believe the 100:1 rule of thumb probably applies: if one
> person asks for something (or complains about something) chances are
> there are 99 more feeling the same way but haven't bothered to voice
> their opinion (i.e. they're basically lurkers -- gradually losing
> patience lurkers but lurkers nonetheless). <shrug>
Hear, hear! (Here, here?)
We are planning on using this in a 64-bit environment and would also
like to see the user libraries available for that. By my count that
would make around 200 people now interested (or am I just a reformed
If it does make it into the plans for future versions, please let me
In the meantime be prepared for lots of questions from us trying to get
From: Fish [mailto:fish at infidels.org]
Sent: 24 June 2008 20:41
To: winpcap-users at winpcap.org
Subject: RE: [Winpcap-users] Wpcap.lib on 64bits Platform
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Gianluca Varenni wrote:
> raymond lim wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Would like to check whether there wpcap.lib is avaliable
> > on 64bits platform. Currently, we could compile wpcap.lib
> > using Visual Studio 2005 on 64 bits Vista.
> At the moment the user level components of WinPcap are 32bit
> only. This means that on a x64 machine, the driver is 64bit,
> but the user DLLs are 32bit only.
Which is definitely not good since it makes it virtually
impossible for people to develop/market 64-bit products that happen
to use/need WinPcap.
> We have definitely thought of providing both x86 and x64 user
> level DLLs (hence x64 LIB files) but mainly due to lack of
What resources are you lacking? Programming help? Hardware? What??
> and the very low number of requests for it, we have never
> actually worked on it.
Perhaps the majority of people/companies needing it have not bothered
to ask for it as they (perhaps naively but that's beside the point)
presumed it would be provided in due time.
Besides, I believe the 100:1 rule of thumb probably applies: if one
person asks for something (or complains about something) chances are
there are 99 more feeling the same way but haven't bothered to voice
their opinion (i.e. they're basically lurkers -- gradually losing
patience lurkers but lurkers nonetheless). <shrug>
It's just a theory mind you. :)
> The main tasks in porting the user level DLLs to x64 are
> - migrate the compilation environment to VS2005 (previous
> do not easily support x64 compilation).
> - compile packet.dll under x64 and understand if we need
> different packet.dll for XP and Vista.
> - compile wpcap.dll under x64. This can be a lil tricky as
> this library is mostly a port of libpcap under Windows, and
> contains several conditional compilation definitions.
> - modify the installer to install the right DLLs on all the
> various supported OSes.
> - make sure that all the current samples in the devpack
> compile for x64 as well.
Yep. Been there. Done that. Got the T-shirt.
So if *I* can do it what's *your* excuse? :)
> Have a nice day
You too Gianluca. :)
"Fish" (David B. Trout) - fish(at)infidels.org
Fight Spam! Join CAUCE! <http://www.cauce.org/>
(Any HTML email received will be deleted unread)
PGP key fingerprints:
RSA: 6B37 7110 7201 9917 9B0D 99E3 55DB 5D58 FADE 4A52
DH/DSS: 9F9B BAB0 BA7F C458 1A89 FE26 48F5 D7F4 C4EE 3E2A
 I say "virtually" [impossible] because, even though no 64-bit
packet.dll is currently provided, it *is* nonetheless still possible
to write a 64-bit program that uses WinPcap by simply having it
(marshall? thunk? not sure of the correct terminology here) all
WinPcap requests through a 32-bit child process via some means of
Inter-Process Communication (which I hope you'll agree is a pain in
 Since you *do* after all provide a 64-bit device driver and
besides, what good is a 64-bit operating system if you can't run
64-bit programs on it?!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Winpcap-users