[Winpcap-users] Message: 5 question about the api 'PacketSendPacket'

Wed Jan 30 18:51:07 PST 2013

Hi, GV 
I try to send jumbo packet through windows xp's loopback interface.
Does it support the way I do?
If not, could I try the 1G ethernet interface and enable the jumbo capability? 

Regards. 

xfma

2013-01-31 

马晓飞
工作电话：02759100279
手机：15071274654 
烽火通信网络产出线IP协议组
xfma at fiberhome.com.cn

发件人： winpcap-users-request at winpcap.org 
发送时间： 2013-01-31  06:17:44 
收件人： winpcap-users at winpcap.org 
抄送： 
主题： Winpcap-users Digest, Vol 94, Issue 8 

Send Winpcap-users mailing list submissions to
winpcap-users at winpcap.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
winpcap-users-request at winpcap.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
winpcap-users-owner at winpcap.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Winpcap-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
   1. Missing pcap_start_oem()? (Rich Chomiczewski)
   2. Re: Missing pcap_start_oem()? (Gianluca Varenni)
   3. Re: Missing pcap_start_oem()? (Rich Chomiczewski)
   4. Re: Windows 8 (Gianluca Varenni)
   5. Re: question about the api  'PacketSendPacket' (Gianluca Varenni)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:12:02 -0500
From: Rich Chomiczewski <rchomiczewski at gmail.com>
To: winpcap-users at winpcap.org
Subject: [Winpcap-users] Missing pcap_start_oem()?
Message-ID:
<CAF2XbyXkgckBKCSVUhgS9vMRH5pqB+68_6TAZSbfd5NWiNiiBw at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I'm working on upgrading from 4.0.2 to 4.1.2 and noticed that
pcap_start_oem() is no longer exported from wpcap.dll.
What was the original purpose of that API?
Why was it removed?
-- 
Rich
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winpcap.org/pipermail/winpcap-users/attachments/20130130/aa0db18a/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:01:52 +0000
From: Gianluca Varenni <Gianluca.Varenni at riverbed.com>
To: "winpcap-users at winpcap.org" <winpcap-users at winpcap.org>
Subject: Re: [Winpcap-users] Missing pcap_start_oem()?
Message-ID:
<8A9226C4990BF648BD21174A6F44BDFD73EA1E6A at 365EXCH-MBX-P3.nbttech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
That API is not part of the standard WinPcap library. It was part of WinPcap Professional, which is no longer on sale.
Have a nice day
GV
From: winpcap-users-bounces at winpcap.org [mailto:winpcap-users-bounces at winpcap.org] On Behalf Of Rich Chomiczewski
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:12 PM
To: winpcap-users at winpcap.org
Subject: [Winpcap-users] Missing pcap_start_oem()?
I'm working on upgrading from 4.0.2 to 4.1.2 and noticed that pcap_start_oem() is no longer exported from wpcap.dll.
What was the original purpose of that API?
Why was it removed?
--
Rich
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winpcap.org/pipermail/winpcap-users/attachments/20130130/eb75bc25/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:08:24 -0500
From: Rich Chomiczewski <rchomiczewski at gmail.com>
To: winpcap-users at winpcap.org
Subject: Re: [Winpcap-users] Missing pcap_start_oem()?
Message-ID:
<CAF2XbyVorSPRtt_iRKPCvWP3S8k1S-YZ+YNsSQ2BZWmo083vig at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
What functionality have we lost with its removal?
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Gianluca Varenni <
Gianluca.Varenni at riverbed.com> wrote:
>  That API is not part of the standard WinPcap library. It was part of
> WinPcap Professional, which is no longer on sale.****
>
> ** **
>
> Have a nice day****
>
> GV****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* winpcap-users-bounces at winpcap.org [mailto:
> winpcap-users-bounces at winpcap.org] *On Behalf Of *Rich Chomiczewski
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:12 PM
> *To:* winpcap-users at winpcap.org
> *Subject:* [Winpcap-users] Missing pcap_start_oem()?****
>
> ** **
>
> I'm working on upgrading from 4.0.2 to 4.1.2 and noticed that
> pcap_start_oem() is no longer exported from wpcap.dll.****
>
> ** **
>
> What was the original purpose of that API?****
>
> ** **
>
> Why was it removed?****
>
> ** **
>
> --
> Rich****
>
> _______________________________________________
> Winpcap-users mailing list
> Winpcap-users at winpcap.org
> https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
>
>
-- 
Rich
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winpcap.org/pipermail/winpcap-users/attachments/20130130/27254071/attachment-0001.html>
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:12:24 +0000
From: Gianluca Varenni <Gianluca.Varenni at riverbed.com>
To: "winpcap-users at winpcap.org" <winpcap-users at winpcap.org>
Subject: Re: [Winpcap-users] Windows 8
Message-ID:
<8A9226C4990BF648BD21174A6F44BDFD73EA1E97 at 365EXCH-MBX-P3.nbttech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Chris,
I've been thinking about it, but it's a major effort (read it as "rewrite a good chunk of the kernel capture driver"). WHQL certification has not that important so far (we don't certify the driver, we just sign it), we install the driver in such a way that doesn't require WHQL certification.
Regarding XP, there is still a big community using it in corporate and non-corporate environments, so dropping support for it is definitely not an option. 
The advantages of migrating to NDIS6 would be
- probably better performance (but it's not guaranteed) and in general avoiding to go thru the thunking layer between NDIS5 (what we currently use) and NDIS6
- support for RT (although I'm not sure if just supporting NDIS6 would be enough)
- cleanup of the driver sources
Have a nice day
GV
-----Original Message-----
From: winpcap-users-bounces at winpcap.org [mailto:winpcap-users-bounces at winpcap.org] On Behalf Of belinea123 at gmx.de
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 1:58 AM
To: winpcap-users at winpcap.org
Subject: Re: [Winpcap-users] Windows 8
> There will be, most probably by mid/end February.
> 
> GV
> 
Do you have plans to make a NDIS 6 version?
According to the following link, NDIS 6 offers different possibilities for performance optimization and other features. NDIS 6 is required in order to obtain a WHQL certification.
http://www.osronline.com/showthread.cfm?link=220627
According to this link, NDIS 6 is required if you want the driver to run on Windows RT:
http://www.osronline.com/showThread.cfm?link=237365
AFAIK the NDIS 6 driver won't run on Windows XP. But Windows XP will stop receiving security updates in 2013, so the old NDIS 5 driver will not have to be maintained for a long time.
Regards
Chris Troester
_______________________________________________
Winpcap-users mailing list
Winpcap-users at winpcap.org
https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:15:25 +0000
From: Gianluca Varenni <Gianluca.Varenni at riverbed.com>
To: "winpcap-users at winpcap.org" <winpcap-users at winpcap.org>
Subject: Re: [Winpcap-users] question about the api
'PacketSendPacket'
Message-ID:
<8A9226C4990BF648BD21174A6F44BDFD73EA1EB7 at 365EXCH-MBX-P3.nbttech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
The limit comes directly from the underlying NIC driver.
Are you trying to transmit on a 1G/10G Ethernet port? Did you enable support for jumbo frames in your NIC properties?
Have a nice day
GV
From: winpcap-users-bounces at winpcap.org [mailto:winpcap-users-bounces at winpcap.org] On Behalf Of ???
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 6:52 AM
To: winpcap-users
Subject: [Winpcap-users] question about the api 'PacketSendPacket'
[cid:image001.png at 01CDFEF4.3F0CC810]
[cid:image002.png at 01CDFEF4.3F0CC810]
hi,
I used to send packet length larger than ethernet mtu 1500 with the api 'PacketSendPacket ', and return error. So I want to know how to do it sussessfully.
Thanks!!!
2013-01-30
________________________________
???
?????02759100279
???15071274654
?????????IP???
xfma at fiberhome.com.cn<mailto:xfma at fiberhome.com.cn>
[cid:image003.png at 01CDFEF4.3F0CC810]
[cid:image001.png at 01CDFEF4.3F0CC810]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winpcap.org/pipermail/winpcap-users/attachments/20130130/e387e70b/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 183 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <http://www.winpcap.org/pipermail/winpcap-users/attachments/20130130/e387e70b/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 183 bytes
Desc: image002.png
URL: <http://www.winpcap.org/pipermail/winpcap-users/attachments/20130130/e387e70b/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 183 bytes
Desc: image003.png
URL: <http://www.winpcap.org/pipermail/winpcap-users/attachments/20130130/e387e70b/attachment-0002.png>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Winpcap-users mailing list
Winpcap-users at winpcap.org
https://www.winpcap.org/mailman/listinfo/winpcap-users
End of Winpcap-users Digest, Vol 94, Issue 8
********************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.winpcap.org/pipermail/winpcap-users/attachments/20130131/5ad829e6/attachment-0001.html>