[pcap-ng-format] Issue #23: Need to determine how to assign new Block Types/Option Codes in future

Michael Richardson mcr at sandelman.ca
Mon Aug 24 19:16:20 UTC 2015


Hadriel Kaplan <the.real.hadriel at gmail.com> wrote:
    > I'm not sure it matters that much which way, except I'm not sure
    > independent submissions to the RFC Editor can ask for IANA registries,
    > since their contract is with the IETF. (or whatever they call their
    > MOU through ICANN)

ISE can have IANA considerations.
the first and secound round of IMAP was entirely ISE, btw.

    > p.s. In hindsight we should have just put the thing on google docs and
    > opened it up for multiple people to edit at the same time for a week
    > or two, and then at the end of the week, saved it and pushed the
    > changed doc into the repo. That way people wouldn't need to know/learn
    > git, and could see changes in real time. We could still do that if you
    > think it needs a lot more word-smithing.

either works for me.
Worth schedule a G+ Hangout or two as well.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     mcr at sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [



More information about the pcap-ng-format mailing list