[pcap-ng-format] New Version Notification for draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-02.txt

[Michael Richardson]

Michael Tuexen <tuexen at fh-muenster.de> wrote:
    >> internet-drafts at ietf.org wrote:
    >>> Diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-tuexen-opsawg-pcapng-02
    >>
    >> Hi, I have converted the xml to markdown.

    > Why? If we want to publish this, it will be published in xmlv3. So
    > better to use that format earlier...

It's so so so much easier to maintain and update and get contributions.
github will render it directly....

If you object strongly, we can stick to XML.

    >> The results in the diff are okay, but actually the conversion is not
    >> complete as I cheated and left the tables as preformatted figures, and
    >> there are many internal references that I have no yet updated.
    >>
    >> The xml file had a long list of URLs as references, many of which were
    >> duplicated.  I will be going through and fixing those in the next week
    >> or so.
    >>
    >> This work has been discussed on and off in OPSAWG, but at this point I
    >> am going to suggest that the document just go through the Independant
    >> Submission Editor.

    > Do we want to finally publish that? Up to now, I think the point was to
    > find a home where it is substantially discussed and improved...

If we can get OPSAWG to adopt it, great.
I'm just not holding my breath.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr at sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.winpcap.org/pipermail/pcap-ng-format/attachments/20200928/3c1009ef/attachment-0001.sig>